Illinois Adult-Use Cannabis Craft Grower License

Justin A. Silva • January 10, 2020

What Every Craft Grower Applicant Needs to Know Before Sowing Seeds

The Illinois Department of Agriculture (“IDOA”) released the Application for Adult Use Cannabis Craft Grower License (“Application”), along with its Emergency Administrative Rules ( 8 IAC 1300 ) (“Administrative Rules”) related to Craft Grower, Infuser, and Transporter licenses. This article will provide Craft Grower Applicants with pertinent information related to the Application and Administrative Rules. Infuser and Transporter applications will be discussed in detail in an article to follow.


Craft Grower License and Application Summary


  • Submittals : Beginning February 14, 2020, and no later than March 16, 2020, Redacted and Unredacted version required.
  • Awarded : On or before July 1, 2020
  • Availability : (40) Craft Grower Licenses on or before July 1, 2020. By December 21, 2021, the IDOA shall issue up to (60) additional Craft Grower licenses
  • Fees : Non-refundable $5,000 Application fee. If an Applicant is awarded a license, the fee for a Craft Grower License is $40,000. Qualified social equity applicants will pay 50% of those fees
  • Limits : Any person or entity awarded a license pursuant to the initial application period can only hold one craft grower license. Any person or entity awarded a license during this second application period cannot hold more than two craft grower licenses



Craft Grower Application and Exhibit Specifics

Applicants for a Craft Grower License will be ranked using the following 1000-point scale:


  • Exhibit A - Suitability of the Proposed Facility (75 points)
  • Exhibit B - Suitability of Employee Training Plan (50 points)
  • Exhibit C - Security Plan and Recordkeeping (145 points)
  • Exhibit D - Cultivation Plan (75 points)
  • Exhibit E - Product Safety and Labeling Plan (95 points)
  • Exhibit F - Business Plan and Services to be Offered (110 points)
  • Exhibit G - Status as a Social Equity Applicant (200 points)
  • Exhibit H - Labor and Employment Practices (20 points)
  • Exhibit I - Environmental Plan (20 points)
  • Exhibit J - Illinois Owner (90 points)
  • Exhibit K - Status as a Veteran (20 points)
  • Exhibit L - Diversity Plan (100 points)
  • Exhibit M - Bonus Section (2 points)
    • In the event of tie, the IDOA may award up to 2 bonus points for any of the three initiatives: (1) community benefits plan, (2) substance abuse prevention plan, (3) local community/neighborhood report


Only the top-scoring Applicants that receive at least 75% of available points , will be issued Craft Grower Licenses by the Department. In order words, if you cannot receive at least 750 points, do not bother applying. Further, if you are not a Social Equity Applicant (200 points) and do not have Veteran status (20 points), you are at a major disadvantage seeing that, at best, your perfect score would only be 780 points – a harsh starting point in any competitive application market.

While Exhibits A through M above are similar to those found within the Application for Cannabis Dispensary Licenses, the following additional Exhibits are notably different and therefore discussed in further detail below.


Exhibit N : Property Ownership – 8 IAC 1300.300(c)(28) Applicant must submit different documentation depending on Applicant’s status as the property owner.

  1. If the property is owned by the Applicant , Applicant must submit: confirmation of land ownership, identification of any and all mortgagees and or perfected lienholders, and if applicable, verification of notification to any and all mortgagees and/or perfected lienholders that the property is to be used as a craft grow facility at least through December 31, 2021; and consent thereto by any mortgagees and/or perfected lienholders;
  2. If the property of the proposed location is leased by the Applicant , Applicant must submit: a copy of the lease, confirmation of land ownership, identification of any mortgagees and/or lienholders, a written statement from property owner and/or landlord certifying consent for a craft grow facility to be operated on the premises by the applicant at least through December 31, 2021, and if applicable, verification of notification by the property owner to any and all mortgagees and/or perfected lienholders that the property is to be used as a craft grow facility at least through December 31, 2021, and consent thereto by any mortgagees and/or perfected lienholders.
  3. If the property is not owned or currently leased by the Applicant , Applicant must submit: a written statement from property owner and/or landlord certifying consent for the applicant to lease or purchase the land for the purpose of operating a craft grow facility at least through December 31, 2021, and if applicable, the additional verification as noted above as if the property were leased.

While property location and/or identification was not required for Dispensary Licenses, this is certainly not the case for Craft Grower Licenses. Bottom line, a Craft Grower License shall be issued for the specific location identified on the Application , and is valid only for the owner, name designated on the license and the location for which it is issued .


Exhibit O : Notice of Proper Zoning - this Exhibit contains two parts: one to be completed by the Applicant, and one to be completed by the local zoning authority. Both parts must be completed. According to the Administrative Rule Section 1300.350, Craft Growers shall:

  1. Not be located within 1,500 feet to another craft grower or a cultivation center (410 ILCS 705/30-30(o)); and
  2. Not be in violation of any other local zoning requirements .

Therefore, at the time of Application submittal, the Applicant must include a copy of the current local zoning ordinance or permit and verification that the proposed craft grower is in compliance with the local zoning rules and distance limitations established by the local jurisdiction. Identifying existing properties with proper zoning will be a crucial step for any Application.


Exhibit P : Organizational Information and Financial Interest Disclosure – 8 IAC 1300.305 requires that an Applicant disclose all relevant financial information related to the craft grower. In responding to this Exhibit, Applicants are encouraged to review the definition of “financial interest” in the rules, and Sections 1300.305 and 1300.300(c)(22)-(27). The Application further requires the following:

  1. Copies of compensation agreements, management agreements, supply agreements, or other financial documents between or among the Applicant and any persons having a financial interest and/or control in the licensee , including growers, owners, and officers, or a narrative if the agreement is oral.
  2. Documentation establishing that Applicant has at least $20,000 in liquid assets .
  3. Nature and type of any outstanding bonds, loans, lines of credit, etc., issued or executed, or to be issued or executed, in connection with the opening or operating of the proposed craft grower.
  4. Disclosure of all sources of funding used to acquire or develop the craft grower business and documentation of such funding .

Exhibit P is rather thorough and will most likely require a CPA attesting to the liquid asset requirement or possibly other financial documents. Additionally, if the Applicant is an entity, the entity will have to provide documentation that it has $20,000 in liquidate assets, likely requiring a bank account in the entity’s name which may be a challenge establishing an account at any FDIC insured bank. Moreover, Exhibit F (Business Plan) must show detailed sources and amounts of funds needed for short- and long-term operations. Again, these are not requirements which were included for Dispensary Licenses; however, they have been deemed requirements for Craft Grower Licenses, thereby creating additional challenges for all Applicants.


Conclusion

Of course, there are several miscellaneous items within the Application and Administrative Rules which are still unknowns at this point. Such as, confusing definitions in the Administrative Rules:


  • “Craft Grower” - …licensed by the Department to cultivate, dry, cure, and package cannabis and perform other necessary activities to make cannabis available for sale at a dispensing organization or use at an infuser…. may share premises with an infuser or a dispensing organization, or both....
  • "Cultivation Center" - … cultivate, process, transport (unless otherwise limited by this Act), and perform other necessary activities.....
  • “Early Approval Adult Use Cultivation Center License” - cultivating, infusing, packaging, transporting (unless otherwise provided in the Act)....

Additional confusion pertains to scoring requirements and whether Craft Grower Licenses allow for infusing and/or processing of cannabis. If so, why does the Craft Grower Applications not require an infusion plan?

As with Dispensary Licenses issued by the IDFPR, the IDOA is encouraging Applicants to submit written questions regarding the application, application materials, or application process. Shapiro & Associates Law has already submitted several questions to the IDOA and encourages you to contact us directly if we can be of assistance in navigating the many intricate parts of the Craft Grower License or any other cannabis organization license application process.


Justin Silva is an attorney at Shapiro & Associates Law. Please contact him at jsilva@shapiroassociateslaw.com or (312) 763-9640.

By Dan Shapiro September 4, 2024
69 Acre Land Acquisition
By Dan Shapiro June 20, 2024
Introduction Last summer, an attorney filed a legal brief he had written with the help of the generative AI platform, ChatGPT. The document included citations to a series of legal cases that seemingly offered precedents that supported his client’s position. There was only one problem. As the judge in the case discovered, six of those cases did not exist. Instead, they were dreamed up by the online tool. This was only one of several high-profile incidents in which new technology has sometimes embarrassed the lawyers using it. Yet many legal experts believe generative AI will also change the legal profession in ways that will aid lawyers and their clients. Lawyers must be accountable for how they use AI. Not only must they carefully assess any bias inherent in algorithms before using it, but they must also consider ethical and fairness issues. AI holds tremendous promise to free legal professionals from the most time-consuming tasks, work more efficiently than ever, and empower them to focus on strategic projects that truly matter. Still, there are many ethical considerations of AI to keep in mind. Ethical Issues Depending on your jurisdiction, there may be formal ethical opinions addressing the use of AI. Be sure to confirm the existence of these ethics’ opinions or guidelines and how they apply to the use of AI. Bias And Fairness AI uses trained algorithms to analyze vast amounts of data. These algorithms can collect biased historical information, which means that the AI system may also inadvertently produce biased results, leading to questionable outcomes. Algorithms can be difficult to interpret, and it can be challenging to understand how they arrive at their decisions or source information. Privacy AI systems often rely on sizable amounts of data, including highly sensitive and confidential information, and may store personal and conversation data. When using the technology, lawyers need to ensure that AI systems adhere to strict data privacy regulations. For example, lawyers using ChatGPT must familiarize themselves with its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use before using the service. Additionally, they must make sure that the data is only used for the specific purposes for which it was collected. Lawyers must also consider professional obligations relating to privacy and information-sharing when providing any information with AI systems to ensure they are not running afoul of confidentiality obligations (to clients or other parties) or otherwise disclosing information improperly. Responsibility And Accountability As a rule of thumb, AI should be used as a complement to work, and not a replacement. While AI can streamline time-consuming and mundane tasks, strategic decision-making, complex legal analysis, and legal counsel are all examples of responsibilities that it simply cannot take over. As a result, lawyers must be proactive in establishing clear lines of responsibility and accountability when implementing AI in their firm. Summary As the use of AI in law firms becomes increasingly widespread, it is important that legal professionals address the ethical considerations surrounding it and ensure the technology is being used responsibly. By doing so, lawyers will be able to enjoy AI’s benefits while maintaining an ethical practice at the same time. In the end, AI has its benefits but it should not be relied upon to accurately apply the law to a fact pattern in the context of giving sound legal advice. Accurate legal advice includes understanding the context in which the law exists, experience and human thoughtfulness.
By Dan Shapiro May 30, 2024
Public Hearings: Keys to Successful Presentations
By Dan Shapiro April 18, 2024
HB 3306, HB 2099 and The Corporate Transparency Act
By Dan Shapiro March 21, 2024
Client Success
By Dan Shapiro January 11, 2024
A Glimpse into the 2024 Commercial Real Estate
By Dan Shapiro November 9, 2023
Planning for your Property's Financial Future, by Jamie Baer
By Dan Shapiro August 17, 2023
Commercial Real Estate Conversion Options
By Dan Shapiro March 28, 2023
Tax Increment Financing Updates
Show More
Share by: